Summary of ideas
2 people (2 Males) are sitting on a bench near a forest/lake/something spooky.
A woman stumbles out of nowhere into the middle of their sight clutching a book.
The two people rush over to the woman’s aid and call an ambulance.
The first person sees the books and is intrigued; he takes it and puts it into his pocket.
- Two Weeks Later -
The second person (The one without the book) is walking down the street. At this point the names of cast members come up below the walking.
Out of nowhere a female figure with a knife and mirrored sunglasses holds the knife to his throat.
The camera is very wobbly and depicts a struggle.
The body falls to the floor and the bloody knife falls next to it in slow motion.
The camera is on the floor, so all you can see is the woman’s feet up to roughly her knees.
The woman bends down and picks up the knife.
She walks away.
As she walks away, the name of the film comes up.
The film itself as a whole is about two men who witness a woman in a bad state stumbling out of a forest. One of these men steals a book from her and tries to figure out what was going on with it. The book is actually a diary that is locked and covered in blood, but the stranger is not put off by this fact. The film follows the man trying to unlock the diary and find out why it is covered in blood, thus finding out that the woman is actually a murderer; alongside following the woman trying to track down the man because she doesn’t want him to find out her secret.
The first few minutes show the first person being killed and the woman initially being found with the book.
This fits in with the thriller genre theme because it follows the life of a murderer alongside a person whose friend has been murdered by this same person. It would fit in with the sub-genre of a ‘Moral confrontation Thriller’ as it is a struggle between the good (The male who initially steals the book, but later tries to solve the crime) and the bad (The woman who is a murderer).
385 Words.
No comments:
Post a Comment